Belgian trade body criticises proposed cumulation ban
The Belgian Association of Gaming Operators (BAGO) has said government plans that would force players to hold separate accounts for different verticals pose a “serious threat” to consumer protection
The Belgian Association of Gaming Operators (BAGO) has said regime plans that would personnel players to throw split accounts for different verticals impersonate a “serious threat” to consumer protection.
New lawmaking would require customers to registry multiple accounts with an manipulator for different forms of iGaming, such as online cassino and sports betting.
This proposal comes away the rearward of several amendments to Belgium’s Gambling Act that were assign forwards inwards 2019.
While the archetype amendments would feature permitted players to use a bingle answer for when accessing different offerings, this unexampled proposal looks to censor the practice.
In response, BAGO decried the move, arguing that it would, among other things, hinder operators’ ability to safeguard consumers.
In a LinkedIn post, the organisation listed IV key reasons for its disapproval. BAGO stated: “The player loses the overview of his expenses.
“Operators turn a loss a holistic aspect of players’ play behaviour, making it to a greater extent hard to find problematic behaviour and the power to discourage and send word unnatural players.
“Sharing consolidated information on job gaming behaviours with government and academics is made more difficult, which prevents the evolution of new perspectives and futurity policies.
“For reasons of informality of play, customers depart to illegal operators, who past definition do non abide by the rules and hence make out not extend protection.”
In conclusion, the organisation said: “BAGO therefore advocates for the maintenance of unified player accounts by operator inwards say to extend greater, break and substantiated participant protection.”